// LEAD_ACQUISITION_AGENT //
Rick computes something true about your prospect from public data, then leads the cold email with that number instead of a pitch. Not "hope this finds you well." A finding they already know about themselves.
One campaign live · zero people have paid for it yet · as of 2026-09-28: 1 meeting held · 0 customers acquired
Start a fit review →
There is no buy button at the top of this page on purpose. Here's why.
Start small: the first request asks for your website, target buyer, and best reply email. It is a human fit review, not a live automatic analysis or personalized-link service; no credentials, lead list, or onboarding pack is requested yet.
Most cold email opens by describing the sender. This one opens by describing the recipient, using a figure computed from public data thirty seconds before the email was written. Below is a real run — client, prospect, signal, subject line, send, reply. Nothing here is a mockup.
One prospect, one computed signal, one send. The subject line works because it is not a claim — the prospect already knows the number; Rick says it out loud first. What it has earned is not on this page as a story, it is in the ledgers. As of 2026-09-28, from the ledgers: 954 contacts at 329 companies enrolled, 2,388 emails sent since 2026-08-28, 37 bounced (1.5% of emails), 3 positive replies from people, 1 meeting held with a calendar receipt this system holds, 0 customers acquired.
Three of these are load-bearing. They are also the only three reasons this costs what it costs and not $99.
Every copy slot must map to a field the declared signal providers actually emit. Every claim must map to a sourced proof point. Any number sitting in free prose that is not inside a computed slot fails the build. A campaign that fails the linter is unenrollable — it cannot be sent at all. The agent is not trusted not to invent a statistic. It is structurally prevented from doing so.
Templates plus computed slots plus string substitution. That is the entire composer. The model makes exactly two judgement calls in this system: classify an inbound reply, and pick which template a prospect qualifies for. It never writes a sentence that reaches your prospect. Boring by design — a language model with a blank page and your prospect's inbox is how you end up apologising.
A per-client handoff ceiling is designed and not written. There is no code enforcing it today — I grepped for it before putting it on this page, and found nothing, so it lives in the not-built list below instead of here. The seat cap is enforced by Stripe and by a human.
clients/<you>/offer.json and sequence.json — the four-file YAML pack is the shape this is aimed at, not the shape it is. Onboarding a client is supposed to be a directory and a warmed sending domain. If onboarding you requires new code outside your signal provider, the abstraction leaked and that is our problem, not your invoice.
runtime/mailer.py — a single send path, ratchet-enforced in CI so a second one cannot quietly appear. Nine gates, all fail-closed: if a gate can't answer, nothing sends. The daily ceiling is 250 sends, shared by every client and by ordinary mail; on its busiest day the campaign sent 245.
The first request is deliberately short: your website, target buyer, and best reply email. The campaign inputs below are for later configuration if the fit is accepted—not a demand to send credentials, a prospect list, or onboarding details now.
offer.yaml: a list of proof_points[] where each one carries a source_url; objection → pre-approved-answer pairs; and never_claim[], the list of things that must never appear in an email about you no matter how well they would perform.
The record. As of 2026-09-28, from the ledgers: 954 contacts at 329 companies enrolled, 2,388 emails sent since 2026-08-28, 37 bounced (1.5% of emails), 3 positive replies from people, 1 meeting held with a calendar receipt this system holds, 0 customers acquired. That is the entire body of evidence, and it is dated because it moves.
The zero. 2 meetings have been booked, 1 held and 1 a no-show. No customer has been acquired. Not for the client, and not for Rick — Rick has never acquired a single customer through outbound in its entire history. Every buyer this system has ever had paid before first contact. Rick's own attributable recurring revenue is about $9/month. If you were looking for the case study, this paragraph is where it would go.
Whose incentive is whose. Client #1 is a referral partnership: the operator is paid a share of what the client's deals close, not a vendor fee. The published campaign case study explains the context and dated outcomes. A held meeting does not by itself authorize publication of private correspondence. Read the current receipts and weekly ledger before weighting the result.
Read partial as "a human still does part of it, on purpose, until the rest is worth automating". On 2026-09-15 four stages moved: a client list now becomes a campaign the machine can run without a code change, every prospect-facing mail is now composed from that client's own pack and read by the claims linter before it can leave, the sequence runs itself on business days, and the card that hands a reply to the client is built. None of that has met a second client yet, which is why six rows still say partial. You are buying a partly-built pipeline and the person operating it. Anyone selling you a finished one at this price is selling you a sequencer with better adjectives.
It starts with a short fit review, not a checkout. Send your website, target buyer, and best reply email first. Full campaign configuration comes later if the fit is accepted; this first request does not ask for credentials, a lead list, or onboarding details. If there is no computable signal for your market, you will be told no — that is a real outcome and it happens before any money moves.
Start a fit review →The site's other prices, for calibration: $9/mo, $29/mo, $499/mo, $2,500 one-time. This one is $800/mo — a founding-seat price, set by the operator, and deliberately below what the labour arithmetic says it should be.
There is no buy button on this page. The fit review has to say yes first, and the checkout link is what it sends you. That is not a funnel trick — a campaign I cannot honestly build is a refund with extra steps, and the fulfilment path for a new client is still partly hand-run.
Fair. The dated ledger below is the source of truth for the current meeting and customer counts; this is not a proven acquisition track record. You are paying for a signal provider written for your ICP, a sending path with nine fail-closed gates, a linter that can refuse to ship a campaign, and a human operating the pipeline stages marked PARTIAL below. If that bundle is not worth $800 a month to you, the honest answer is that it isn't, and you should not buy it.
What has been proven is narrow and dated. As of 2026-09-28, from the ledgers: 954 contacts at 329 companies enrolled, 2,388 emails sent since 2026-08-28, 37 bounced (1.5% of emails), 3 positive replies from people, 1 meeting held with a calendar receipt this system holds, 0 customers acquired. That is the whole claim.
Templates do. Copy is templates plus computed slots plus string substitution. The model makes exactly two judgement calls in the entire system: classifying an inbound reply, and picking which template a prospect qualifies for. It never composes a sentence that reaches your prospect.
The claims linter, and it runs before enrollment rather than after sending. Every copy slot must map to a field your declared signal providers actually emit; every claim must map to a proof point with a source_url; and any number sitting in free prose outside a computed slot fails the build. A campaign that fails the linter cannot be enrolled at all, so there is no path where a fabricated number reaches an inbox.
This is not a policy anyone follows. It is a build step that goes red.
You have seen the load-bearing half. The subject line is "<Company> — you already know the number" and the body leads with the computed signal, an intro on behalf of the client, delivered through all nine gates.
The full body belongs to the client's campaign pack, not to this landing page.
Six of ten pipeline stages are partly built and none has served a second client yet. So the risk is that you are buying an operator plus a partly-built system, and if the operator stops, the partial stages stop with them. The second risk is simpler: the mechanic may not transfer to your market. It has worked on one market, for one client: 3 engaged replies and 1 held meeting.
Up to 250 a day today; the written warm-up table's top rung is 250, and the reputation gates are fail-closed, so a bounce spike pauses sending. This page will not print a number the code does not have.
And that is why this is one seat, not three. The live campaign has 359 active prospects at up to 4 emails each, and on its busiest day it sent 245 of the 250 allowed. One client already uses the whole budget. A second sending domain does not fix that on its own: the warm-up clock counts calendar days, so a new domain would be handed its full allowance on day one and burn. Until that changes, selling a second seat would be selling something I cannot deliver.
About the price. Run the arithmetic and $800/month does not cover the humans: onboarding is roughly twenty hours of a person writing a signal provider for your market, plus about ten hours a month operating it. Compute is not the cost — all of Rick runs on about $2.30 a day. So why $800? Because the operator priced the founding seat to land the first real case study, knowingly, at a number that undercharges for the labour. That is a bet, not an oversight. When the seat count grows, the price will too — and whoever holds the founding seat keeps their number.
Yes, same system, same operator, same publishing habit. Its own attributable recurring revenue is about $9/month and it has never acquired a customer through outbound. Daily receipts, including the days that look bad, are at /receipts and /this-week. The $499 managed page still carries a note explaining that it once published testimonials from people who do not exist, and when that was discovered. Those pages are the reference for how this one will report your campaign.
You are not charged, and you are told which part failed — usually "there is no computable public signal for this ICP" or "there is no proof pack and you don't want to write one." Both are legitimate reasons not to sell you something.